@article {599,
	title = {Discouraged Entrepreneurs and Persistence in Local Entrepreneurship. The Italian Case, 2001-2008},
	journal = {L{\textquoteright}industria, Rivista di economia e politica industriale},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {155{\textendash}172},
	publisher = {Societ{\`a} editrice il Mulino},
	keywords = {Entrepreneurial Rate, Entrepreneurship, Local Production Systems, Path-Dependence, Persistence},
	issn = {0019-7416},
	doi = {10.1430/97175},
	url = {https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/97175},
	author = {Giulio Cainelli and Donato Iacobucci and Alessandra Micozzi}
}
@article {585,
	title = {The dark side of collaborations for innovation: Are collaborations with universities darker than those with other partners?},
	journal = {Industria},
	volume = {37},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {613-636},
	publisher = {Societa Editrice il Mulino},
	abstract = {<p>In addition to its advantages, collaboration for innovation might increase the cost of innovation because of leakages of strategic information, appropriability problems and coordination difficulties. When collaborating with public research institutions (pris) the latter problem is expected to be more severe, thus raising the probability of project failure. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether and to what extent collaboration for innovation raises the probability of failure, i.e. delay or abandonment of innovative projects. It also aims to verify whether and to what extent collaboration with PRIs increases the likelihood of failure. We use data from the fourth Italian Community Innovation Survey (cis 4), which collected data for the three-year period 2002-2004. The empirical results support the hypothesis that collaboration significantly affects the probability of delay or abandonment of innovative projects. However, collaboration with PRIs does not increase the likelihood of failure compared to collaboration with other partners. Moreover, we find that delays are influenced by cost factors (such as lack of financial resources) or knowledge factors (such as lack of qualified personnel) while abandonment is significantly associated with market factors (such as uncertain demand).</p>
},
	issn = {00197416},
	doi = {10.1430/86053},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85017646412\&doi=10.1430\%2f86053\&partnerID=40\&md5=ace67a6a95eb6aa6e09536d2212b7e95},
	author = {Guzzini, E. and Iacobucci, D.}
}
@article {GROW:GROW12112,
	title = {Do Geographic Concentration and Vertically Related Variety Foster Firm Productivity? Micro-Evidence from Italy},
	journal = {Growth and Change},
	volume = {47},
	number = {2},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {197{\textendash}217},
	abstract = {Using a large unbalanced panel dataset of more than 12,000 Italian manufacturing firms for the period 1999{\textendash}2007, this paper investigates the role of geographic concentration and related variety on firms{\textquoteright} total factor productivity (TFP). The main idea is that diversification{\textemdash}captured by a measure of vertically related variety{\textemdash}promotes firm innovativeness and, consequently, productivity, but when the technology has been consolidated, firms join specialized clusters that enhance efficiency. Our results suggest that the effect on firms{\textquoteright} TFP of geographic concentration is stronger than that of related variety. We also confirm previous findings on the relevance of agglomeration forces for small firms compared with medium and large firms, where these agglomerative forces do not seem to influence TFP.},
	issn = {1468-2257},
	doi = {10.1111/grow.12112},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/grow.12112},
	author = {Cainelli, Giulio and Ganau, Roberto and Iacobucci, Donato}
}
@article {Cainelli2015,
	title = {Do Geographic Concentration and Vertically Related Variety Foster Firm Productivity? Micro-Evidence from Italy},
	journal = {Growth and Change},
	year = {2015},
	note = {cited By 0; Article in Press},
	keywords = {Business Groups , Entrepreneurship},
	doi = {10.1111/grow.12112},
	url = {http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84931351442\&partnerID=40\&md5=f0abefdeb2cbd51236eeb538bf93956f},
	author = {D. Iacobucci and R. Ganau and G. Cainelli}
}
@article {Iacobucci2014107,
	title = {Designing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at regional level: Some open questions [Progettazione e implementazione della strategia regionale di specializzazione intelligente: Alcune questioni aperte]},
	journal = {Scienze Regionali},
	volume = {13},
	number = {1},
	year = {2014},
	note = {cited By 7},
	pages = {107-126},
	keywords = {Smart Specialization Strategy},
	url = {http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84909958928\&partnerID=40\&md5=f5a3b10789882f7cf3932e230ff68bda},
	author = {D. Iacobucci}
}
@inbook { 11566_83972,
	title = {Distretti e cluster: agglomerazione, spec{\`\i}alizzazione e variet{\`a}},
	booktitle = {Innovazione e trasformazione industriale: la prospettiva dei sistemi di produzione locale italiani},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {137{\textendash}142},
	publisher = {Il Mulino.},
	organization = {Il Mulino.},
	address = {Bologna},
	keywords = {Smart Specialization Strategy, Technology Transfer},
	author = {D. Iacobucci}
}
@article {Cainelli2009305,
	title = {Do agglomeration and technology affect vertical integration? Evidence from Italian business groups},
	journal = {International Journal of the Economics of Business},
	volume = {16},
	number = {3},
	year = {2009},
	note = {cited By 7},
	pages = {305-322},
	keywords = {Business Groups },
	doi = {10.1080/13571510903227049},
	url = {http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955847133\&partnerID=40\&md5=f606b7347f5d48308a2bd0b7a8cd3675},
	author = {D. Iacobucci and G. Cainelli}
}
@inbook { 11566_42102,
	title = {Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial team development in SMEs},
	booktitle = {Dynamic Capabilities Between Firm Organisation and Local Systems of Production},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {73{\textendash}90},
	publisher = {Routledge},
	organization = {Routledge},
	address = {LONDON},
	keywords = {Entrepreneurship},
	author = {D. Iacobucci}
}
@article { 11566_82744,
	title = {Dimensione economico-organizzativa e strategie di crescita nei gruppi manifatturieri italiani},
	journal = {L{\textquoteright}INDUSTRIA},
	volume = {XXVIII},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {160{\textendash}180},
	author = {Giulio Cainelli and Donato Iacobucci}
}
@book {Iacobucci200773,
	title = {Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial team development in SMEs},
	series = {Dynamic Capabilities Between Firm Organisation and Local Systems of Production},
	year = {2007},
	note = {cited By 0},
	pages = {73-90},
	keywords = {Entrepreneurship},
	doi = {10.4324/9780203937396},
	url = {http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84911102243\&partnerID=40\&md5=a6978ace25b2edc522c983937d322e97},
	author = {D. Iacobucci}
}
@article { 11566_30206,
	title = {Diffusione e specificit{\`a} organizzativa dei gruppi d{\textquoteright}impresa nei distretti industriali italiani},
	journal = {ISTITUZIONI E SVILUPPO ECONOMICO},
	year = {2004},
	publisher = {Milano : Franco Angeli},
	keywords = {Business Groups },
	author = {G. Cainelli and D. Iacobucci and E. Morgante}
}
@inbook { 11566_39408,
	title = {Diffusione e caratteristiche dei gruppi di piccole e medie imprese nelle aree distrettuali delle Marche},
	booktitle = {Diffusione e caratteristiche dei gruppi di piccole e medie imprese nelle aree distrettuali},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {174{\textendash}237},
	publisher = {GIUFFRE{\textquoteright} EDITORE},
	organization = {GIUFFRE{\textquoteright} EDITORE},
	address = {MILANO},
	keywords = {Business Groups , Smart Specialization Strategy},
	author = {D. Iacobucci and V. Balloni}
}
@article { 11566_82735,
	title = {Distretti industriali, sistemi di piccola impresa, reti e gruppi: una breve riflessione},
	journal = {ECONOMIA MARCHE},
	volume = {XIX},
	year = {2000},
	pages = {7{\textendash}15},
	keywords = {Business Groups , Technology Transfer},
	author = {V. Balloni and D. Iacobucci}
}
