@article {633,
	title = {Well-being and the Great Recession in Spain},
	journal = {Applied Economics Letters},
	volume = {26},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {1279-1284},
	abstract = {This letter assesses the impact of the Great Recession on well-being in Spanish provinces using two alternative composite indicators of objective well-being that include somewhat different dimensions. Whereas the crisis notably eroded economic well-being, its impact on overall well-being{\textendash}which in addition to economic dimensions also includes non-economic ones{\textendash}was imperceptible. This result points to the need to carefully define and assess well-being in empirical analyses. {\textcopyright} 2018, {\textcopyright} 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \& Francis Group.},
	doi = {10.1080/13504851.2018.1545076},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85057323982\&doi=10.1080\%2f13504851.2018.1545076\&partnerID=40\&md5=8c1c7e7e007862acc896792c134e7794},
	author = {Peir{\'o}-Palomino, J. and Perugini, F. and Picazo-Tadeo, A.J.}
}
@article {595,
	title = {A Well-Being Indicator for the Italian Provinces},
	journal = {Social Indicators Research},
	volume = {142},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {149-177},
	publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
	abstract = {<p>In recent years, a significant number of papers has been published providing alternative measures of progress and well-being to Gross Domestic Product. Most of these papers differs in terms of their theoretical approach as well as their purpose and statistical methodology used to define what well-being is and how to measure it. In this paper, we construct a well-being indicator for the Italian provinces that shows a high degree of heterogeneity not only between the Northern and Southern Italian provinces, but also among adjacent provinces. {\textcopyright} 2018, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature.</p>
},
	keywords = {civil society, Gross Domestic Product, Italy, quality of life, socioeconomic indicator, territory},
	issn = {03038300},
	doi = {10.1007/s11205-018-1888-1},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044543892\&doi=10.1007\%2fs11205-018-1888-1\&partnerID=40\&md5=12e20f4b00963d996888aa47c308a449},
	author = {Calcagnini, G. and Perugini, F.}
}
@article {589,
	title = {What are the trade-offs of academic entrepreneurship? An investigation on the Italian case},
	journal = {Journal of Technology Transfer},
	volume = {43},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {198-221},
	publisher = {Springer New York LLC},
	abstract = {<p>This study addresses the following research questions: what happens to the propensity to collaborate with other firms, once the researcher creates her own venture? Do her collaborations decrease or do they grow? These questions have been overlooked by the current literature, even though they carry important policy implications. Our key suggestion is that the effectiveness of a technology transfer tool can be better assessed by taking into account the possible crowding-out effects with other channels of knowledge transfer. We do so for Italy, by comparing the behavior of single researchers, before and after the establishment of their own firm, with the behavior of a control group. We assess whether those academics that founded their own firm significantly change their attitude to perform research collaborations with other firms by means of co-publication and co-patenting. We also verify whether creating a firm has an impact on the overall patenting and publication performance. Our results suggest that there is a negative effect on the overall publishing performance, while the patenting activity does not change significantly. Regarding co-publications, our results confirm the existence of a substitution effect between spin-offs and co-publication with firms, while we observe an increase in the case of co-patenting. A closer look at the data, however, suggests that the latter is mainly triggered by the patenting activity that the researcher performs with his or her own company. {\textcopyright} 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.</p>
},
	keywords = {Academic entrepreneurship, Behavioral research, Economic and social effects, Knowledge management, Patenting activities, Patents and inventions, Policy evaluation, Policy implications, Propensity score matching, Public policy, Publishing, Research collaborations, Spin off, Substitution effect, Technology Transfer},
	issn = {08929912},
	doi = {10.1007/s10961-016-9482-7},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84968547880\&doi=10.1007\%2fs10961-016-9482-7\&partnerID=40\&md5=2133632f90803ed24d87019494bbaefb},
	author = {Barbieri, E. and Rubini, L. and Pollio, C. and Micozzi, A.}
}
